Curriculum-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Improving Long-Context Logical Reasoning in Foundation Models
Keywords:
curriculum learning, reinforcement learning, foundation models, long-context reasoning, reward shaping, distributed training, fairness, robustnessAbstract
Foundation models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding and generation, yet their performance on long-context logical reasoning tasks remains inconsistent and fragile. Traditional reinforcement learning approaches for fine-tuning these models often rely on uniform reward signals that do not account for the hierarchical nature of reasoning chains. This paper proposes and examines a curriculum-guided reinforcement learning framework designed to systematically improve long-context logical reasoning in foundation models. The framework structures training progression through increasingly complex reasoning episodes, where the curriculum is defined by context length, logical depth, and inter-sentence dependency distance. We analyze the architectural trade-offs inherent in scaling such curricula, including the computational overhead of maintaining long-range attention, the risk of catastrophic forgetting during curriculum transitions, and the need for dynamic reward shaping. Infrastructure considerations for distributed training of large models under curriculum constraints are evaluated, with emphasis on memory-efficient checkpointing and asynchronous policy updates. Robustness and fairness implications are discussed in terms of reward bias amplification, distributional shift in reasoning strategies, and the potential for curriculum design to inadvertently reinforce narrow reasoning patterns. Policy and governance challenges related to deploying curriculum-trained models in sensitive domains such as legal reasoning and medical diagnosis are explored. Empirical case illustrations from recent experiments on multi-hop question answering and mathematical proof generation provide grounding for the conceptual arguments. The paper concludes with a forward-looking perspective on integrating meta-learning principles into curriculum design and on aligning reasoning curricula with human cognitive development trajectories.
References
1. Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009). Curriculum learning. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, 41–48.
2. Weinshall, D., Cohen, G., & Amir, D. (2018). Curriculum learning by transfer learning: Theory and experiments with deep networks. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, 5238–5246.
3. Florensa, C., Held, D., Wulfmeier, M., Zhang, M., & Abbeel, P. (2017). Reverse curriculum generation for reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, 482–495.
4. Portelas, R., Colas, C., Hofmann, K., & Oudeyer, P. Y. (2020). Teacher algorithms for curriculum learning of deep RL in continuously parameterized environments. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Robot Learning, 83–94.
5. Christiano, P., Leike, J., Brown, T. B., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
6. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347.
7. Jiang, Z., Xu, F. F., Gao, L., Sun, Z., Liu, Q., Dwivedi-Yu, J., ... & Callan, J. (2023). Active retrieval augmented generation. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 7969–7992.
8. Beltagy, I., Peters, M. E., & Cohan, A. (2020). Longformer: The long-document transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05150.
9. Dai, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Le, Q. V., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2019). Transformer-XL: Attentive language models beyond a fixed-length context. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2978–2988.
10. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., ... & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459–9474.
11. Kumar, A., Ma, T., & Liang, P. (2022). Self-training with selective reweighting improves robustness to distribution shift. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 14122–14136.
12. Xu, Y., Song, G., Qiu, Z., & Sun, M. (2022). Progressive reasoning for complex question answering. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5423–5435.
13. Dou, Z., Zhao, Q., Wan, Z., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Raiyan, T., ... & Biswas, S. (2025). Plan Then Action: High-Level Planning Guidance Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01833.
14. Badrinath, A., & Kochenderfer, M. J. (2023). Reward shaping for safe reinforcement learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 78, 571–608.
15. Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D., & Meger, D. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning that matters. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 32(1).
16. Han, R., Chen, C., & Sun, X. (2024). Fairness-aware curriculum learning for language models. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 211–225.
17. Rajeswar, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2020). Meta-learning for curriculum generation in reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00324.
18. Narasimhan, K., & Barzilay, R. (2021). Learning compositional reasoning via structured curriculum. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2340–2353.
19. Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Rashkin, H., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., Roesner, F., & Choi, Y. (2019). Defending against neural fake news. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32.
20. Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2022). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(1).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Intelligent Engineering Systems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
